The Bookkeeping Secret to Retail Store Profitability

January 22, 2012  |   San Diego Bookkeeping   |     |   Comments Off on The Bookkeeping Secret to Retail Store Profitability

When most small business owners talk to us about our San Diego bookkeeping service they are primarily thinking along the lines of how it will help them be more timely in paying bills and doing payroll and how it will play into their taxes.

This is certainly the prevailing concept of what bookkeepers are for and it is true as far as it goes. But there is so much more that can be done when you have the data from your business to use in making intelligent decisions about what to do next. The article below is a perfect example. Just looking at the surface level factors it would be very difficult to understand exaclty what is going on and how to address the problem areas.

Once you dig a little into the numbers behind the business however you can make smart decisions about how to fix the current problems and move forward in a way that avoids those problems in the future.

All the brainstorming and hypothesizing about it won’t do any good if you don’t have real numbers to analyze. But when you do have your numbers handy, the process becomes much more straight forward and rational.

This is the added value you get from having your business financial information recorded correctly in a timely manner. There is no way the very small cost of getting this done won’t pay off it you invest the time to understand what the numbers are there to tell you.

And then you may end up like the business in the story- moving from three shops to 15 profitably instead of having to close one down and wondering what went wrong.

One retail client of ours had a small boutique business unit (selling upscale French clothing) that was a real puzzler. They were seeing great profitability in their New York boutique, significant losses from their Los Angeles boutique, and moderate profitability just down the street in Orange County. They were not sure how to move forward.

Profits in New York and Orange County were largely offset by the losses in LA, so all three options were legitimately on the table. They asked us to dig into the operation and help them make the right decision.

Profit per Square Feet:  Margin vs. Rent

We considered five factors that might be driving their vastly different results in each boutique:

  1. Were their rental costs different?
  2. Were they selling a different mix of products?
  3. Were they pricing differently?
  4. Were they staffing the stores differently?
  5. Were they selling to a different demographic mix, with different buying patterns?

Digging deeper, we found that the biggest driver of boutique profitability–by far–was the ratio of sales per square foot vs. rent per square foot.

Key Profit Driver:

Sales/Rent Ratio = Sales per Square Foot/ Rental Costs per Square Foot

The New York boutique was paying very high rent but on a relatively small footprint. This was apparent when we visited the store:

  • The space was packed floor to ceiling with inventory
  • The aisles were small and crowded
  • The stock room was quite small, requiring 90 percent of the inventory to be kept on the shelves
  • Due to space limitations, the store stocked only 60 percent of the available SKUs

Despite those challenges, the boutique was generating roughly the same level of sales as the LA boutique, which was three times the size. The big lesson: a smaller store does not mean proportionately smaller sales.

Could the New York boutique have generated higher sales with a larger footprint?  Probably.  But if they expanded their footprint by 25 percent, and sales grew by 10 percent, they would have lost money. At the end of the day, there was only so much demand for fashionable French clothing in the New York City area; a more spacious boutique might have delivered a better shopping experience, but would not have been nearly so profitable.

By contrast, the LA boutique was one of the more spacious and pristine shops we had ever seen. The aisles were wide, and the shelves were tastefully stocked, with a spacious stock room to hold the bulk of the inventory. As a result, the store carried 90 percent of available SKUs, with a wide and deep selection.

The LA boutique certainly offered a much better shopping experience. However, their sales/rent ratio was one-third that of the New York store. Our client had locked in losses the day they signed the lease. There was simply no way to achieve a profitable sales/rent ratio in the LA store.

If you have retail operations, ask yourself: Could I create more value per square foot by shrinking my footprint? That’s what our client did. We set them on a 4-step process for sizing boutiques in potential new markets:

Step 1:  Estimate the total demand in the local market (more on that in a future article)

Step 2:  Estimate total store sales based on capturing a reasonable share of that demand

Step 3:  Based on rental rates in the local market, determine the maximum boutique square footage

Step 4:  Design the store to fit in the footprint allowed

Based on this approach, the boutique was able to confidently and profitably expand, and is now up to 15 locations in North America.

 

Comments are closed.

Related Posts